Phase 2 and Phase 3 ask different questions
二期与三期,问的问题不同
Phase 2 explores whether a treatment shows useful benefit and which dose or regimen to pursue. Phase 3 aims to confirm benefit and safety in a broader, usually larger program suitable for a regulatory application. Sample size matters, but purpose, controls, follow-up and the strength of the evidence matter too. COMP005 and COMP006 are trial names; they do not mean Phase 5 and Phase 6.
二期主要探索药物是否有值得继续研究的效果,以及剂量和方案怎么选。三期旨在通过通常更大、更广的项目,确认疗效与安全性,为监管申请提供证据。样本数重要,但目的、对照、随访和证据质量也重要。COMP005、COMP006 是试验名称,不是第五期、第六期。
MADRS: lower is better
MADRS:越低越好
MADRS is a clinician-rated depression symptom scale from 0 to 60. A negative change usually means symptoms fell. A treatment-control difference of −3.8 means the treatment group improved by an additional 3.8 points on the study’s adjusted analysis. Compare the same endpoint and timepoint. A larger number of participants, or the label COMP006, says nothing by itself about symptom worsening.
MADRS 是由评估者评分的抑郁症状量表,范围 0–60。变化量为负通常表示症状减轻。治疗组相对对照为 −3.8,表示在该试验的调整分析中,治疗组额外改善了 3.8 分。比较时要使用同一终点与时间点。样本数增加、或试验编号变成 COMP006,本身都不表示病情加重。
What a small p-value tells you
很小的 p 值说明什么
A p-value asks: if there were no group difference, and the statistical assumptions held, how unusual would results at least this extreme be? p<.001 means less than 0.1% under that model. It is not a 99.9% chance that the drug works, a measure of improvement size, or proof that bias is absent.
p 值问的是:如果两组确实没有差异,而且统计假设成立,出现至少这么极端的结果有多罕见?p<0.001 表示在这个模型下低于 0.1%。它不是“药物有 99.9% 的概率有效”,也不衡量改善幅度,更不能证明没有偏差。
A percentage needs a denominator
百分比,需要分母与范围
GH’s 57.5% is 23 out of 40, not a precise promise for future patients. My Wilson 95% confidence interval calculation is approximately 42.2%–71.5% for that group; placebo 0/41 gives approximately 0%–8.6%. These are separate group intervals, not an interval for the difference. Repeated use of this interval procedure has about 95% coverage under its assumptions. It accounts for sampling uncertainty, not unblinding or selection bias. [3]
GH 的 57.5% 是 40 人中的 23 人,不是对未来患者的精确承诺。按 Wilson 方法自行计算,该组的 95% 置信区间约为 42.2%–71.5%;安慰剂组 0/41 对应约 0%–8.6%。这是各组的区间,不是两组差值的区间。在假设成立时,反复使用这种区间方法,约有 95% 会覆盖真实比例。它处理抽样不确定性,不处理揭盲或选择偏差。[3]
The five-line note I keep
我只保留的五行笔记
Stage: what has actually finished? Evidence: how much, how fast, how durable, compared with what? Delivery: total visit time and resources? Cash: date, balance and guidance? Financing: gross or net proceeds, and how many new shares? Those five lines make each quarterly update comparable.
阶段:实际上完成了什么?效果:改善多少、多快、多持久,与什么相比?效率:整个就诊需要多少时间和资源?现金:哪天的余额、公司如何预测?融资:总额还是净额,新增多少股?每季用同样五行,才能比较变化。
Sources资料来源
Plain-text references. Financial balances are dated June 30, 2026; source review completed October 6, 2026.保留文字参考资料。财务余额截至 2026 年 6 月 30 日;资料核对日期为 2026 年 10 月 6 日。
- Compass Pathways. Second Phase 3 COMP360 primary-endpoint announcement. February 17, 2026.
- Cubała WJ, Bajbouj M, Bauer M, et al. GH001 vs Placebo in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2026;83(6):561–569. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2026.0096.